<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Headline Heaven:  Get People To Read Your Emails</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bigbadbookblog.com/2009/10/16/headline-heaven-get-people-to-read-your-emails/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bigbadbookblog.com/2009/10/16/headline-heaven-get-people-to-read-your-emails/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 21:44:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: blackwatertown</title>
		<link>http://www.bigbadbookblog.com/2009/10/16/headline-heaven-get-people-to-read-your-emails/comment-page-1/#comment-461330</link>
		<dc:creator>blackwatertown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 13:21:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bigbadbookblog.com/?p=1734#comment-461330</guid>
		<description>As someone on the receiving end of many many press release emails, I happily endorse the good advice above. Thankfully most of the book related emails that pop into my inbox are sensibly written and straightforward. Publishers, I thank you. (A lot from other sources are dire.)
But I quibble with your final point, No.15. I&#039;ve found the world &quot;exclusive&quot; to have been thoroughly devalued, to the extent that it immediately presses a negative button in my mind. The world &quot;exclusive&quot; tends to be a filler word, a vain attempt to conceal a paucity of other ideas. That&#039;s just my experience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As someone on the receiving end of many many press release emails, I happily endorse the good advice above. Thankfully most of the book related emails that pop into my inbox are sensibly written and straightforward. Publishers, I thank you. (A lot from other sources are dire.)<br />
But I quibble with your final point, No.15. I&#8217;ve found the world &#8220;exclusive&#8221; to have been thoroughly devalued, to the extent that it immediately presses a negative button in my mind. The world &#8220;exclusive&#8221; tends to be a filler word, a vain attempt to conceal a paucity of other ideas. That&#8217;s just my experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
