The Wisdom of Crowds: Wikiblicity
By Aaron HierholzerThe ultra-low barriers to entry into Wikipedia, the encyclopedia that anyone can edit, have prompted many to ask: “Why not write an article about myself?” Whether or not this is a good idea depends on who you are. Most Wikipedia users don’t care to read about Joe from Boise’s affinity for black jeans and Springsteen’s early work. But what if the person in question were the author of a book—perhaps a book with a brand-new Web-savvy marketing campaign? Unfortunately, it takes more than authorship to get respect at Wikipedia. But it may still be able to give you a push.
Wikipedia has a conflict-of-interest policy, which it implements rigorously, and legions of devoted Wikipedians monitor new articles posted on the site. They professionalize and consolidate information and look for potential abuse, normally deleting over one thousand articles a day. Blatant hoaxes and utter nonsense are axed by means of “speedy deletion.” More contentious articles are listed in “Articles for Deletion,” Wikipedia’s log of entries which are under scrutiny and likely to be deleted. Articles for Deletion is a sort of forum in which users weigh in on whether they think the article should stay or go.
If you decide you want to use Wikipedia to get your name out there as an author, here are some guidelines. Abiding by them will help you avoid ending up on the bad side of Wikipedia’s argus-eyed (and potentially grudge-holding) users:
- Notability: This is the big one. In other words, why would anyone unaffiliated with the subject of the article be interested in reading it? What’s important about the subject? Did it make an important contribution to its field or to history? In order to make your articles “notable,” factual information is a must, along with significant awards or recognition the subject has received. The arbiters of WikiJustice are sensitive to information intended solely for marketing or PR. Case in point: the blocked adjustments made to technical articles by someone commissioned by Microsoft. MyWikiBiz.com was also forced out of Wikipedia for offering to write articles for clients for a fee (they’ve now founded Centiare.com, a wiki site which encourages businesses to write entries about themselves). In other words, new entries have to demonstrate that they exist for some reason other than convincing someone to buy something—even if the “something” is really good and interesting of itself.
- Verifiability: All information in the article should be backed by valid references. Entries with no sources are far more susceptible to being tagged for deletion. Wikipedia discourages “independent research.”
- Neutral Point of View: It shouldn’t be apparent that the author of the article has an affinity for or personal connection to the subject. Advertising is anathema to Wikipedians. Articles with the slightest scent of marketing are eligible for speedy deletion. Wikipedia also closely tracks the usernames and IP addresses which add information, and goes so far as to identify suspected “sockpuppets,” or multiple usernames used by one writer to make his/her claims seem more valid. It’s not technically a problem to write a bunch of related articles under one username, but doing so may throw up red flags and subject your articles to closer scrutiny.
When considering whether to create an article, remember that any information you provide, once posted, is subjected to the often cruel world of universally editable online content. It’s a good idea to periodically check an article’s content to be sure someone hasn’t made incorrect edits which misrepresent you or your work.
While there are many things to avoid, creating a valid entry in Wikipedia about yourself or your work is not impossible. The best way to avoid offending the Wikipedia ethic is by having a good attitude and a sincere interest in expanding the catalog of uncompromised information that Wikipedia strives to be, rather than trying to blatantly market yourself or your product via the project. And of course, given the Wikipedia community’s inimitable style, a notable, neutral, verifiable article will impress them a lot more anyway.






