<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Big Bad Book Blog &#187; design</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bigbadbookblog.com/tag/design/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bigbadbookblog.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 16:32:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Seriously, &#8220;Avatar&#8221;? Papyrus?</title>
		<link>http://www.bigbadbookblog.com/2010/01/13/seriously-avatar-papyrus/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bigbadbookblog.com/2010/01/13/seriously-avatar-papyrus/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 20:52:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greenleaf Book Group</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[design & production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Avatar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comic sans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kindle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[papyrus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pr*tty Sh*tty]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bigbadbookblog.com/?p=2011</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When the first promo material for James Cameron&#8217;s groundbreaking 3D sci-fi eco-parable Avatar was released, pretty much anyone with any aesthetic sensibility was shocked and appalled by the use of the much-maligned typeface Papyrus for the titles and captions. Particularly for a film with a budget in the hundreds of millions, it seems inconceivable that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.bigbadbookblog.com/wp-content/uploads/200px-Avatar-Teaser-Poster.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-2013" style="border: 4px solid white;" title="200px-Avatar-Teaser-Poster" src="http://www.bigbadbookblog.com/wp-content/uploads/200px-Avatar-Teaser-Poster.jpg" alt="" width="116" height="172" /></a>When the first promo material for James Cameron&#8217;s groundbreaking 3D sci-fi eco-parable <strong><em>Avatar</em></strong> was released, pretty much anyone with any aesthetic sensibility was shocked and appalled by the use of the much-maligned typeface <strong>Papyrus</strong> for the titles and captions. Particularly for a film with a budget in the hundreds of millions, it seems inconceivable that they couldn&#8217;t spring for something a little classier and a little less hole-in-the-wall restaurant menu. We&#8217;ve talked Papyrus <a href="http://www.bigbadbookblog.com/2009/04/20/the-font-that-makes-you-look-the-lamest/" target="_blank">before</a> in discussions of font-related missteps in book design, so we thought we&#8217;d mention this <a href="http://prttyshttydesign.blogspot.com/2010/01/open-letter-to-james-cameron-from.html">truly hilarious letter</a> from a design blog. Says one anonymous commenter, &#8220;At least he didn&#8217;t use <a href="http://bancomicsans.com/">Comic Sans</a>.&#8221;<span id="more-2011"></span></p>
<p>On a different note, the same blog <a href="http://prttyshttydesign.blogspot.com/2010/01/wednesday-waffler-kindle-commercial-and.html" target="_blank">calls</a> that twee <strong>Amazon Kindle</strong> commercial a &#8220;beautiful ad in almost every possible way.&#8221; What do you think of it? Does it effectively tell viewers what a Kindle is? Is it cute n&#8217; cuddly enough?</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><span style="color: #ffffff;">__</span><br />
<object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="344" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/nDjhkGNVSxQ&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/nDjhkGNVSxQ&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<script type="text/javascript">
  addthis_url    = 'http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bigbadbookblog.com%2F2010%2F01%2F13%2Fseriously-avatar-papyrus%2F';
  addthis_title  = 'Seriously%2C+%26%238220%3BAvatar%26%238221%3B%3F+Papyrus%3F';
  addthis_pub    = '';
</script><script type="text/javascript" src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/addthis_widget.php?v=12" ></script>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bigbadbookblog.com/2010/01/13/seriously-avatar-papyrus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Typography: It’s a (Copyrighted) Art</title>
		<link>http://www.bigbadbookblog.com/2009/10/13/typography-it%e2%80%99s-a-copyrighted-art/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bigbadbookblog.com/2009/10/13/typography-it%e2%80%99s-a-copyrighted-art/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 22:47:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greenleaf Book Group</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design & production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fonts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[typographers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[typography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bigbadbookblog.com/?p=1865</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It was with my burgeoning interest in design several years ago that I first became aware of the art of typography—how fonts are set in a design to appeal to readability, practicality, and aesthetic tastes. I’ve by no means since become a font aficionado, though I am something of a snob about choosing just the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="size-medium wp-image-1878  alignleft" title="letters" src="http://www.bigbadbookblog.com/wp-content/uploads/letters-300x199.png" alt="letters" width="300" height="199" />It was with my burgeoning interest in design several years ago that I first became aware of the art of typography—how fonts are set in a design to appeal to readability, practicality, and aesthetic tastes. I’ve by no means since become a font aficionado, though I am something of a snob about choosing <em>just the right font</em> for my creative work.</p>
<p>There are those—typographers—who have made this their goal: to create just the right font for any situation. It is a true art. The intricacy of font work lends itself to a great deal of vision, patience, and mayhap a bit of oddity. (Check out “<a href="http://www.creativepro.com/article/dot-font-being-a-typographer">Being a Typographer</a>” at CreativePro.com).</p>
<p>It is the same as any other unique image—and has just as much of a claim over copyright. But that fact is something we occasionally forget. ‘We’ being anyone from a personal user creating a poster for a band to a business creating a website for their product to, say, <a href="http://cityfile.com/dailyfile/7508">a very large company using the fonts for their ads</a>.</p>
<p>Such was the case with <a href="http://www.nbc.com/">NBC</a>, which is currently facing a lawsuit from typographic firm <a href="http://www.fontbureau.com/">The Font Bureau</a> over a mishandling of font licensing. The Font Bureau, which is a big shot in the typographic world (having designed over 1,500 fonts for over 300 companies, according to their website), claims that NBC did not secure the rights to use a handful of fonts that appeared in their fall marketing campaign. A big mistake, as without proper licensing, all of that advertising can be pulled and would need to be redone. And <em>that</em> is an extremely expensive process.</p>
<p>Even large companies running intricate and expensive advertising campaigns make mistakes. But the fact of the matter is that, whether this or other incidents were purposeful or honest mistakes, people occasionally see a font as something they have an automatic right to—because it’s there, and it’s only text, and hey, who cares anyway?<span id="more-1865"></span></p>
<p>A lot of people care. Fonts aren’t just text, they aren’t just how you read something. They can determine your perspective, your emotions, your thoughts. They are about appeal, about cleverness, about intrigue. It’s certainly apparent in the publishing industry. Typography is essential to both cover and interior design, and determines if a reader will even pick up your book. Not to mention the delicate balance between creating a good design and creating a design that smacks of the amateur or unprofessional <em>je ne sais quoi</em>, usually in ways more subtle (even subliminal) than we can imagine.</p>
<p>Diatribe aside, take some time to consider typography if you haven’t already. You’ll find that you have tastes and preferences, fonts that you love and fonts that you detest (and <a href="../2009/04/20/the-font-that-makes-you-look-the-lamest/">fonts that you just find lame</a>). You’ll start to notice common fonts and design nuances, the way a sign over a shop or a billboard along the street or a book in your bookstore can grab your attention just by using the text in the right way. And remember that when you are creating your own design, that those typographers have worked to give you a near-infinite selection of font designs to enhance your work. And whether the fonts are purchased or free—show them the love they deserve.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter" title="typography" src="http://www.bigbadbookblog.com/wp-content/uploads/typography1-300x91.png" alt="typography" width="300" height="91" /></p>
<p>Interested in fonts? Here are a few blogs dedicated to fonts and typography:</p>
<p><strong>-        <a href="http://ilovetypography.com/">i love typography</a></strong></p>
<p><strong>-        <a href="http://fontfeed.com/">the font feed</a></strong></p>
<p><strong>-        <a href="http://www.aisleone.net/">AisleOne</a></strong></p>
<p><strong>-        <a href="http://ministryoftype.co.uk/">The Ministry of Type</a></strong></p>
<p><strong>-        <a href="http://tdc.org/tdc/">Type Directors Club</a></strong></p>
<p><strong>-        <a href="http://www.typeoff.de/">TypeOff</a></strong></p>
<p><strong>-        <a href="http://typographer.org/">Typographer.org</a></strong></p>
<p>Looking for fonts to use on your own projects? Free or Creative Commons-licensed fonts:</p>
<p><strong>-        <a href="http://www.dafont.com/">dafont.com</a></strong></p>
<p><strong>-        <a href="http://www.urbanfonts.com/">urbanfonts</a></strong></p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>-        <a href="http://www.fontfreak.com/">Font Freak</a></strong></p>
<script type="text/javascript">
  addthis_url    = 'http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bigbadbookblog.com%2F2009%2F10%2F13%2Ftypography-it%25e2%2580%2599s-a-copyrighted-art%2F';
  addthis_title  = 'Typography%3A+It%E2%80%99s+a+%28Copyrighted%29+Art';
  addthis_pub    = '';
</script><script type="text/javascript" src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/addthis_widget.php?v=12" ></script>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bigbadbookblog.com/2009/10/13/typography-it%e2%80%99s-a-copyrighted-art/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Font That Makes You Look the Lamest</title>
		<link>http://www.bigbadbookblog.com/2009/04/20/the-font-that-makes-you-look-the-lamest/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bigbadbookblog.com/2009/04/20/the-font-that-makes-you-look-the-lamest/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 16:25:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Hierholzer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design & production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comic sans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fonts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[papyrus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bigbadbookblog.com/?p=1470</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a previous post on Fonts That Make You Look Lame, we included Comic Sans in a list of five typefaces that are either played-out or just downright atrocious. And who doesn&#8217;t hate the goofy, amateurish font? The Wall Street Journal recently ran a story about the man behind Comic Sans, Vincent Connare, and the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img id="will" src="http://www.gbgtexas.com/BBBNN/images/comicsans.png" alt="Everyone hates me!" align="left" />In a previous post on <a href="http://www.bigbadbookblog.com/2006/03/30/fonts-that-make-you-look-lame/">Fonts That Make You Look Lame</a>, we included Comic Sans in a list of five typefaces that are either played-out or just downright atrocious. And who doesn&#8217;t hate the goofy, amateurish font? The <em>Wall Street Journal</em> recently <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123992364819927171.html#articleTabs%3Darticle" target="_blank">ran a story</a> about the man behind Comic Sans, <strong>Vincent Connare</strong>, and the couple who founded <a href="http://www.bancomicsans.com/" target="_blank"><strong>Ban Comic Sans</strong></a>, an organization with &#8220;global ambitions&#8221; to eliminate this ominpresent affront to aesthetic sensibility. Fortunately, Connare seems to have a sense of humor about his creation—according to the article, he and the founders of Ban Comic Sans are considering doing a picture book together. Good idea! I&#8217;d buy it.</p>
<p>However, Comic Sans is merely the most visible in a huge group of stale typefaces. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Papyrus_(typeface)" target="_blank">Papyru</a><a href="http://">s</a> is a personal pet peeve and also has its own <a href="http://www.papyruswatch.com/" target="_blank">mockery cult</a>. For an interesting debate on Comic Sans, other lame fonts (Souvenir is a &#8220;crime against humanity&#8221;), and whether anyone even cares about fonts, be sure to read some of the <em>WSJ</em> article&#8217;s <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123992364819927171.html#articleTabs%3Dcomments" target="_blank">comments</a>.</p>
<script type="text/javascript">
  addthis_url    = 'http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bigbadbookblog.com%2F2009%2F04%2F20%2Fthe-font-that-makes-you-look-the-lamest%2F';
  addthis_title  = 'The+Font+That+Makes+You+Look+the+Lamest';
  addthis_pub    = '';
</script><script type="text/javascript" src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/addthis_widget.php?v=12" ></script>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bigbadbookblog.com/2009/04/20/the-font-that-makes-you-look-the-lamest/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thoughts on Creativity</title>
		<link>http://www.bigbadbookblog.com/2007/06/27/thoughts-on-creativity/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bigbadbookblog.com/2007/06/27/thoughts-on-creativity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 20:04:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sheila Parr</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design & production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[writing & editing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[a creative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[creative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[creativity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[designer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[good ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[happy face]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[illustration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linus Pauling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smiley face]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bigbadbookblog.com/2007/06/27/thoughts-on-creativity/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img width="128" height="91" alt="Picture 2.png" src="http://www.bigbadbookblog.com/wp-content/uploads/Picture%202.thumbnail.png" id="image493" /><font size="2"><span style="font-family: Verdana">Being a "creative" is hard. I cringe at the label. I'm the first to admit that maintaining the level of inspiration needed to constantly churn out good—no, great—ideas and execute them well is really tough. So I thought I'd share some thoughts on my creative process.</span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being a &#8220;creative&#8221; is hard. I cringe at the label. I&#8217;m the first to admit that maintaining the level of inspiration needed to constantly churn out good—no, great—ideas and execute them well is really tough. So I thought I&#8217;d share some thoughts on my creative process.</p>
<p>Sometimes it feels like the planets are aligned and projects go super crazy well.</p>
<p><img id="image492" src="http://www.bigbadbookblog.com/wp-content/uploads/Picture%201.thumbnail.png" alt="Picture 1.png" width="152" height="110" /></p>
<p>Everyone likes it when that happens. But there are so many factors that go into a great idea that projects often start more like this:<span id="more-495"></span></p>
<p><img id="image493" src="http://www.bigbadbookblog.com/wp-content/uploads/Picture%202.thumbnail.png" alt="Picture 2.png" width="150" height="106" /></p>
<p>For me, creativity requires a fluid state of mind, a positive attitude, confidence in my talents, and the ability to let bright ideas come as they may. On a practical level, being well-rested, happy, fed, caffeinated, and hydrated is key.</p>
<p><img id="image494" style="width: 149px; height: 109px;" src="http://www.bigbadbookblog.com/wp-content/uploads/Picture%203.thumbnail.png" alt="Picture 3.png" /></p>
<p>I recently had the privilege of attending the HOW Design Conference in Atlanta, for which the theme &#8220;refresh&#8221; was perfectly suited. I was totally inspired by the speakers, and reassured that other designers (probably <span style="font-style: italic">all</span> of the 3,000 attendees) struggle with the balance of creativity–which is often on its own timeline–and reasonable workloads and schedules. For me the most destructive thing I can do during my creative process is stare at a blank screen/canvas/sketchpad and tell myself, &#8220;Think of an idea. Think of an idea. Think of an idea. Now. C&#8217;mon. IDEA.&#8221; (This soon degenerates into &#8220;WHAT&#8217;S <span style="font-style: italic">WRONG</span> WITH ME? THINK OF SOMETHING NOW!&#8221;)</p>
<p><img id="image496" src="http://www.bigbadbookblog.com/wp-content/uploads/Picture%204.thumbnail.png" alt="Picture 4.png" width="146" height="107" /></p>
<p>I like this quote by Nobel Prize winner Linus Pauling: “The best way to have a good idea is to have lots of ideas.&#8221; It&#8217;s sort of what artist and author &lt; title=&#8221;Danny Gregory&#8221; href=&#8221;http://www.dannygregory.com/&#8221; target=&#8221;_blank&#8221;&gt;Danny Gregorytalked about at HOW. For a designer, if you only do one drawing, it better be really good. That&#8217;s quite a bit of pressure if you&#8217;re not a super master illustrator. But if you draw every day, just draw anything, you suddenly have this well of ideas to choose from, and some of them are probably great. So I do a lot of image research and make tons of word lists, even of seemingly irrelevant things so I hopefully never feel discouraged.</p>
<p><img id="image497" src="http://www.bigbadbookblog.com/wp-content/uploads/Picture%205.thumbnail.png" alt="Picture 5.png" width="150" height="112" /></p>
<p>Everyone&#8217;s favorite part of the creative process is THAT MOMENT.</p>
<p><img id="image498" src="http://www.bigbadbookblog.com/wp-content/uploads/Picture%206.thumbnail.png" alt="Picture 6.png" width="152" height="116" /></p>
<p>It usually happens a few times for any given project (since the goal is several great ideas, not just one). When it does, I know I&#8217;ve done my job and the project will be the best it can be. I design books, but whether it&#8217;s writing, drawing, cooking, painting, or any other creative field, don&#8217;t forget that your ideas are in there. You just have to find them. And when that happens everyone&#8217;s happy.</p>
<p><img id="image499" src="http://www.bigbadbookblog.com/wp-content/uploads/Picture%207.thumbnail.png" alt="Picture 7.png" width="143" height="105" /><br />
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="font-family: Verdana"><span style="font-family: Verdana"><br />
</span></span></span></p>
<script type="text/javascript">
  addthis_url    = 'http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bigbadbookblog.com%2F2007%2F06%2F27%2Fthoughts-on-creativity%2F';
  addthis_title  = 'Thoughts+on+Creativity';
  addthis_pub    = '';
</script><script type="text/javascript" src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/addthis_widget.php?v=12" ></script>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bigbadbookblog.com/2007/06/27/thoughts-on-creativity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does This Book Make Me Look Fat?</title>
		<link>http://www.bigbadbookblog.com/2007/03/14/does-this-book-make-me-look-fat/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bigbadbookblog.com/2007/03/14/does-this-book-make-me-look-fat/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 13:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Justin Branch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[book criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[book industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evaluate book]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[manuscript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[platform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[price point]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bigbadbookblog.com/2007/03/14/does-this-book-make-me-look-fat/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img align="left" title="makemelookfat.jpg" id="image367" alt="makemelookfat.jpg" src="http://www.bigbadbookblog.com/wp-content/uploads/makemelookfat.thumbnail.jpg" />After spending years carefully crafting your manuscript, it’s tough to subject it to the judging eyes of others. Typically, the first round of reviews brings mostly positive feedback: Family and friends will read your work and be impressed by your tenacity and hard work. You'll probably enjoy an ego-stroke or two when they ask for autographed copies, looking forward to having a published author as a friend or relative.</p> 

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After spending years carefully crafting your manuscript, it’s tough to subject it to the judging eyes of others. Typically, the first round of reviews brings mostly positive feedback: Family and friends will read your work and be impressed by your tenacity and hard work. You&#8217;ll probably enjoy an ego-stroke or two when they ask for autographed copies, looking forward to having a published author as a friend or relative.</p>
<p>The next round may be a little tougher. Industry people won&#8217;t candy-coat their opinions, and you may receive feedback that&#8217;s less than rosy. Take the good with the bad when it comes to criticism of your book, remembering to appreciate fresh perspectives that may illuminate problems you couldn&#8217;t see before. No matter how it may feel at times, most people don&#8217;t enjoy raking you over the coals&#8211;they just want to know if this is a book they can sell.</p>
<p>So what matters to these book people as they evaluate your work with an objective critical eye? Here are six factors they&#8217;ll always look at:<span id="more-366"></span></p>
<ul>
<li><span style="font-weight: bold">Platform: </span>How many people already know you and want the information you are selling? Do you have a preexisting base of consumers for your book?</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><span style="font-weight: bold">Content:</span> Fancy design work and a big publicity push will sell books for a few months, but continued sales rely on word-of-mouth advertising. Word-of-mouth advertising, in turn, relies on quality content that readers will find interesting over a span of time.</li>
<li><span style="font-weight: bold">Marketing:</span> How will you persuade people to run to the bookstore and buy your book?</li>
<li><span style="font-weight: bold">Genre:</span> Is the material appropriate for current trends in the genre? Will it stand out among     other books of its type?</li>
<li><span style="font-weight: bold">Design:</span> Books are always judged by     their cover. Check out the     <a title="http://www.bigbadbookblog.com/category/design-production/" href="http://www.bigbadbookblog.com/category/design-production/" target="blank_">Design &amp; Production</a> category for all kinds of great info.</li>
<li><span style="font-weight: bold">Price point: </span>Price the item appropriately for its genre, length, and trim size. You may think a consumer will not mind paying an extra buck for your book, but bookstore buyers purchasing large quantities of the book will mind that extra dollar very much.</li>
</ul>
<p>At the end of the day, no one can predict how a book will do. The unknowns are scary but inevitable. Make sure the variables you <span style="font-style: italic">can</span> control are all working for you so you&#8217;re in the best position to face the unforeseen. Don’t be discouraged if someone says &#8220;no,&#8221; and don&#8217;t be offended by criticism. Learn what you can and keep pushing forward. This is the entertainment industry after all, and for its author, a book is a bit like a lottery ticket.</p>
<script type="text/javascript">
  addthis_url    = 'http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bigbadbookblog.com%2F2007%2F03%2F14%2Fdoes-this-book-make-me-look-fat%2F';
  addthis_title  = 'Does+This+Book+Make+Me+Look+Fat%3F';
  addthis_pub    = '';
</script><script type="text/javascript" src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/addthis_widget.php?v=12" ></script>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bigbadbookblog.com/2007/03/14/does-this-book-make-me-look-fat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shotgun Publication</title>
		<link>http://www.bigbadbookblog.com/2007/01/09/shotgun-publication/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bigbadbookblog.com/2007/01/09/shotgun-publication/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 18:34:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clint Greenleaf</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design & production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing & publicity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[writing & editing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beer goggles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[book marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[editing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[printing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publicity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sales]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bigbadbookblog.com/2007/01/09/shotgun-publication/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img align="left" title="shotgunwedding.jpg" id="image304" alt="shotgunwedding.jpg" src="http://www.bigbadbookblog.com/wp-content/uploads/shotgunwedding.thumbnail.jpg" />Rushing a book to market without understanding all the consequences of your decision is about as bright as marrying someone you meet in Las Vegas after a fifteen-hour drinking binge. Even if the reasons behind the rush seem legitimate, beware of the beer-goggle effect—your book won’t look nearly as attractive when it comes off the press as it does in your head when you’re deciding to skip vital steps in the publication process. There are three areas where rushing will come back to haunt you with particular vengeance.</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img align="left" title="shotgunwedding.jpg" id="image304" alt="shotgunwedding.jpg" src="http://www.bigbadbookblog.com/wp-content/uploads/shotgunwedding.thumbnail.jpg" />Rushing a book to market without understanding all the consequences of your decision is about as bright as marrying someone you meet in Las Vegas after a fifteen-hour drinking binge. Even if the reasons behind the rush seem legitimate, beware of the beer-goggle effect—your book won’t look nearly as attractive when it comes off the press as it does in your head when you’re deciding to skip vital steps in the publication process. There are three areas where rushing will come back to haunt you with particular vengeance: <span id="more-303"></span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold">Editing</span><br />
Your content has to deliver the goods. Editing isn’t just about making sure your book is free of typos and grammatical errors—it’s the part of the process that focuses on sharpening the reading experience for your customers. If you don’t invest the time and money to have experienced book editors work with your book, success in this industry will be an uphill battle. Don’t try to justify your rush by duping yourself into believing that you can save time-consuming editorial work for the second edition or the next printing. Crappy books don’t go into multiple print runs or second editions. It’s like not showering before a first date and thinking that you can always wash up for the second date—unless you’re meeting the Vegas drunk from the scenario above, there’s no way you’re <span style="font-style: italic">getting</span> the second date, stinky. It’s worth the delay in your book launch to work with an editor who can help you develop a rock-solid title, unique hooks, a smart structure, and a compelling voice. If you rush the editorial process, you’ll compromise the integrity of your work for short-term gains. Is a goal like having books in time for one event really worth that?</p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold">Design and Printing</span><br />
While powerful marketing, a strong author platform, and compelling content are essential for a book to succeed, production quality is equally important. And yet there are countless articles that downplay the importance of quality, often making the obtuse argument that anyone with Photoshop or InDesign can throw a book together in no time, or that the difference between top quality and bottom quality is negligible due to advances in technology. Both assertions are appalling fallacies. The quality of your design and printing determines what kind of first impression your book will make. Retail buyers, book reviewers, and consumer make gut decisions based on this first impression, so while good quality costs money and takes time, this is not an area in which it is okay to be either cheap or hasty.</p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold">Sales and Publicity</span><br />
Sometimes, we’re at the mercy of others. Pitching your book to retail buyers and media outlets is one of those times. If you want to sell your books in bookstores or other trade outlets like Costco and Wal-Mart, know that it takes almost twelve months to get your books ready for distribution.  This time is spent setting up the title in wholesale and retail systems, presenting to buyers, and preparing the logistics for an on-time launch. And there’s similar time sensitivity inherent in a proper publicity campaign. You only have one book launch, and if you don’t get advance review copies to reviewers at least four months prior to publication, your print campaign has virtually no shot at success.</p>
<p>Deciding to produce a book on an abbreviated timeframe may be possible from a purely logistical standpoint, but you shouldn’t rush your book launch unless you’re prepared to have a product that isn’t set up to reach its full potential. So take a breath and slow down. The book of your dreams will wait for you. If you follow the rules and wait too, the launch will be much more special. If you know what I mean.</p>
<script type="text/javascript">
  addthis_url    = 'http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bigbadbookblog.com%2F2007%2F01%2F09%2Fshotgun-publication%2F';
  addthis_title  = 'Shotgun+Publication';
  addthis_pub    = '';
</script><script type="text/javascript" src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/addthis_widget.php?v=12" ></script>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bigbadbookblog.com/2007/01/09/shotgun-publication/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Shape of Things</title>
		<link>http://www.bigbadbookblog.com/2006/12/01/the-shape-of-things/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bigbadbookblog.com/2006/12/01/the-shape-of-things/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 16:31:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sheila Parr</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design & production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sales & distribution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adobe Creative Suite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CS3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[currency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[designers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hindsight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mailing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photoshop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shipping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Treasury]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bigbadbookblog.com/2006/12/01/the-shape-of-things/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img align="left" title="theshapeofthings.jpg" id="image272" alt="theshapeofthings.jpg" src="http://www.bigbadbookblog.com/wp-content/uploads/theshapeofthings.thumbnail.jpg" />According to a federal judge, the U.S. Treasury Department is <a title="http://money.cnn.com/2006/11/28/markets/treasury_ruling/index.htm?eref=rss_topstories" target="blank_" href="http://money.cnn.com/2006/11/28/markets/treasury_ruling/index.htm?eref=rss_topstories">breaking the law</a>   by failing to design and distribute currency that helps the blind and visually impaired distinguish denominations.</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img id="image272" title="theshapeofthings.jpg" src="http://www.bigbadbookblog.com/wp-content/uploads/theshapeofthings.thumbnail.jpg" alt="theshapeofthings.jpg" align="left" />According to a federal judge, the U.S. Treasury Department is <a title="http://money.cnn.com/2006/11/28/markets/treasury_ruling/index.htm?eref=rss_topstories" href="http://money.cnn.com/2006/11/28/markets/treasury_ruling/index.htm?eref=rss_topstories" target="blank_">breaking the law</a> by failing to design and distribute currency that helps the blind and visually impaired distinguish denominations.</p>
<p>It is odd to me that this oops is just now coming up. Currency designers did it right with coins: I can feel the difference between a dime, nickel, penny, and quarter, and when I&#8217;m fishing for laundry money, any coin that&#8217;s not large and ridged just won&#8217;t do. An obvious solution to this ancient oversight is to create paper money of different sizes according to denomination.</p>
<p>Ah, hindsight . . .<span id="more-271"></span></p>
<p>Reconciling art with logistics is an issue that comes up often for designers. We are focused on the idea, the creative concept behind the project—whether it&#8217;s a book cover, a marketing campaign, or an island wrapped in plastic. Part of our reality is inside Photoshop (I&#8217;m keeping my fingers crossed that CS3 will have the ability to make REAL breakfast tacos).</p>
<p>That can cause problems when it&#8217;s time to carry out the design in the real world. The last thing on my mind when I&#8217;m running with a new idea is what the shipping will cost, or if the holiday card with the eye-catching trim size will fit inside the box it&#8217;s supposed to be mailed in. This isn&#8217;t always a bad thing. It allows for unimpeded creativity. But the shape of things is important, and so is coming up for air near the beginning of the design process to make sure that all of your great ideas will work in real life.</p>
<p>Real life also has a habit of introducing new hiccups to work around. Beginning in spring 2007, there will be a 3-cent price hike on first-class stamps and the shape of your mail will have a <a title="www.usps.com/ratecase" href="http://www.usps.com/ratecase" target="blank_">bigger impact</a> on the cost of shipping. If you&#8217;re designing an oversized, butterfly-shaped invitation for a garden party, remember, if it&#8217;s not “machinable” (it can&#8217;t be sorted automatically) it may cost more to mail. Make sure to think about shape—and everything it can affect—early in the project, so you don&#8217;t have to cut corners later.</p>
<script type="text/javascript">
  addthis_url    = 'http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bigbadbookblog.com%2F2006%2F12%2F01%2Fthe-shape-of-things%2F';
  addthis_title  = 'The+Shape+of+Things';
  addthis_pub    = '';
</script><script type="text/javascript" src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/addthis_widget.php?v=12" ></script>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bigbadbookblog.com/2006/12/01/the-shape-of-things/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
